Reflection Essay

I never knew what all went into creating a documentary. Having to do this project really showed me just how hard it is to not only produce it but also showed me that by working well with others the final product can be a success.

Now that the project is all done with, I think that I am most proud of the footage that we got of the AcoUstiKats. Both the practices and the interviews turned out pretty well. Having no experience with filming, I was proud of being able to get high quality sound and image without being too shaky. 

I think that our biggest struggle as a group was narrowing our focus on one thesis. This was something that we all struggled with in our initial podcast as well. We originally planned on focusing on the group’s efforts of becoming better known around Lexington. But once we started doing interviews and planning out how we wanted to our end project to look we decided to take a different approach. We looked at how this group is not just a group of guys who can sing but also a group of close friends. We wanted to show the audience that being in this group has truly impacted their lives. 

After watching our final video I think the one thing I would have liked to change would have been to include more footage of what the entire group does, such as performing at the sorority houses or at an important gig. I think that if we would have been able to include that it would have really shown the audience how much the members enjoy being apart of this group and also how all their hard work pays off.

If we were given more time to complete this documentary, I would have loved to be able to follow this group even longer. I would have liked to follow them as they prepare for the Sing Off audition. I think that seeing them work together under pressure would really show how much the group means to the members. It would also show how close the group really is. I would have also like to be able to capture the memories that the group makes as they prepare and hopefully make it onto the Sing Off instead of just hearing about them to pull the audience in even more.

My job for this project was to film the practice and interviews as well as help think of the questions to ask each interviewee. I also helped create the overall script of the documentary. Working in groups is always hard but to help keep us all working well together we always made sure that everyone’s opinions were heard, and that we made all decisions unanimously so that we could all be satisfied with our final project. I believe that I really did my fair share to help create the documentary and I'm very happy with how it all turned out. 

AcoUstiKats Proposal

Our documentary going to focus on the talent within the AcoUstiKats, as well as the process to become a member of the group. The first three to four minutes are going to focus on the broader topic of who exactly the AcoUstiKats are and why they are important to the community. The rest of the documentary is going to focus on the members themselves and interviews of themselves speaking about their individual experiences and how they became apart of this selective group. In our podcast, we briefly talked about how one becomes a member of the group and how selective process is. We plan to conduct interviews with some of the older members of the group to learn their story about how they became a part of the AcoUstiKats and how this group has affected their lives. In addition to talking to the older members we also plan to talk to the two newest members of the group, Charlie and Tanner, to see their point of the view of the selection process, their goals for over the next few years, and why they joined the AcoUstiKats. Our main audience for the documentary is going to be students and faculty who are involved around campus and also people who have interacted with the AcoUstiKats in some way.

We want to have an informational tone without making it to news like. We do not plan on using any harsh filters or effects, we want it to feel like they are telling us their stories rather than us interviewing each of the members. One introduction shot that we are considering is a panning shot of their faces as they sing. We plan to use close up or medium shots when we do interviews. We want to get shots for a variety of different environments as well, whether it is from a group practice or a performance. For the transitions we plan to get footage from different venues that they perform at such as sorority houses, Keenland, Singletary Center, and Memorial Hall. The majority of our audio we want to include some voiceover, interviews and songs recorded by the AcoUstiKats. We want to incorporate the emotions of some of the members to show how becoming a member of this group is important to each member in a different way. In the beginning, it will be more informational as we focus on who the AcoUstiKats are as a group, but then evolve into something more meaningful as we pick apart the group and transition from focusing on the group as a whole to individual interviews. In the beginning we want to focus on who the AcoUstiKats are to inform viewers who do not know about the group. We plan to use some of the interviews from our podcast and having interviews to ask about what other ways they are involved. We will really focus on how to become a member of such a selective group in the beginning as well. Then in the interviews we plan to ask about their individual experiences on how they became apart of the group and how the group as affected their college experience or even their future. We want to ask the newest members about their recent auditions and what they think of the group so far. Then we also want to ask some of the oldest members about what they remember about going through the selection process and how the group has affected them. For the conclusion we want to elaborate on their goals to get their name out and the upcoming audition, leaving the audience questioning what the AcoUstiKats have in store for the coming year. We want our final shot to be a performance.

Each member of our group will take on different jobs. We picked each person’s job based on his or her individual strengths. When considering filming we have decided that we need to cameramen to get multiple angles. Muhannad and Jenna will be in charge of all the filming. We chose Charlie and Katie to do the interviews because Katie has had previously observed the group for the essay project. We hope to get honest and candied interviews, so we decided that Charlie would be a good interviewer since he is a member of the group and they will already feel comfortable talking to him. Chloe will be in charge of editing because she has previous experience in working with iMovie. We plan to divide this project into a three week long segments. Week one we plan to get the majority of filming and interviews done. Week two will be to begin cutting up our shots to see what we still need to get. Week three we will get last minute details and put the final documentary together.

Korean Netiquette

After watching the “­­Korean Netiquette” documentary, I saw several differences from the "The Archive" and "Anxiety". One of the major differences was that, the reporter is seen throughout the documentary, which gave it more a news like feel. But it still had focused on one main issue of Internet education in Korea. It starts out in the classroom as the teacher is teaching in Korean with subtitles on the bottom of the screen, which grabs the viewer’s attention. There are voice-overs and also interviews in the documentary that conveys all the information the viewers needed to know. There is mostly no background noise creating a more serious tone, but as they look at the signs in the hallway, you start to hear voices of young elementary students singing about Internet etiquette in Korean, which is also how the video ends. I think the singing gives the video a less serious tone. The transitions in the video is the camera moving from outside the school to a classroom, down the hallway and into a different classroom, each of these transitions switches who is being interviewed or changes the topic slightly. There has been no editing to the environment, making it feel very authentic as if the viewer was in the school as well. The one thing I did not like is having the reporter seen in the documentary because he did not add anything extra. I think that if a teacher at the school did the documentary, then it would make since for her to be seen in the video but not just a random reporter. 

Future Service Dogs

Walking through campus, one of the first things that ever caught my eye were the students walking with dogs that wore bright red harnesses that said 4 Paws for Ability. I have come to find out that these students are training future service dogs. The first time I saw these dogs, I missed all of my pets back home. I wanted to know how I could have a dog with me at school. I liked the idea of having a dog with me in my dorm, but I did not think about the amount of work it would take to train a service dog. These dogs go everywhere with their trainer, this includes all of their classes, the library, anywhere they go shopping or out to eat, and then of course they live with their trainer. When I see the dogs with their trainers they seem to always be obediently following their trainers around. Taking a closer look at the students who are involved in the 4 Paws for Ability, its evident that it is a much harder job than it appears. It is not like having a pet by your side at all times. It is a full time job. You are constantly worried about what the dog is doing while you also have to pay attention in your classes and live your own everyday life.

Taken from http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=434679293240437&set=pb.254871674554534.-2207520000.1361549086&type=3&theater

To get more information on 4 Paws for Ability, I contacted the president to find out when the next meeting was, hoping I could sit in to get more of an idea of what it was like to train a service dog. The meeting was held in a small open room, a lot like the room in the picture above, all the chairs and tables were pushed to the sides. When I walked in a couple trainers were already there sitting on the floor, busy with their own conversation, while their dogs laid next to them. None of them really paid any attention to me walking in, not even the dogs seemed to notice me. I sat along the back wall to make sure I could see everything.  As it got closer to the of the start of the meeting, more trainers walked in and even some future trainers came to the meeting. Everyone sat in a giant cluster, and seem to be catching up with each other. I did not even think about the possibility of future trainers coming to this meeting but they seemed to be there to shadow the current trainers so that by next semester they could have their own dog to train. Every future trainer walked in and went straight to a dog to pet and love on it. I found that interesting considering most of the actual trainers did not acknowledge each other’s dogs right away.

Taken from http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=452275631480803&set=pb.254871674554534.-2207520000.1361549005&type=3&theater

The meeting got started right away the president of the organization, a petite young woman, stood up at the front of the room and talked in a confident, enthusiastic voice about some important dates and an upcoming socialization outing to the mall. The picture above shows a group at a mall outing last year. The president reinforced the importance of each the trainer jobs over the next semester. Each of the trainers has the responsibility of getting these dogs used to being around large groups of people. Everyone seemed to be closely listening to the president as spoke to the group showing they were interested in what she had to say. By watching the dogs I could tell that all of the dogs were in different stages of their socialization training, but the majority were still in the beginning stages. Most of these dogs had obviously already gotten the hang of how these meetings worked. They used the beginning of the meeting when all the humans were talking as a time to nap. While two dogs were on edge about being around each other. They were intensely staring at each other for the first half of the meeting. These dogs weren’t wagging their tails or minding their own business they seemed to be nervous about being around each other. It was there trainers who kept trying to get them to just lie down and relax by petting their back and trying to force their head to the floor. This meeting was not only full of sleeping and nervous dogs there were also a couple of who were puppies rolling around playing with their leashes, oblivious to what was going on around them. With these dogs their trainers were trying to swat the dog or pulling the leash away, telling him to stop, one listened right away but the other one took it as playful gestures and only got worse. That dog was ready to play regardless of what the trainer said. But even with all the dogs in this one room it was weirdly quiet, there was not a single bark or whine from any of the dogs the entire meeting. I could hear the president’s speech and a few hushed whispers here and there from the different members.

Taken from http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=431697350205298&set=pb.254871674554534.-2207520000.1361549086&type=3&theater

The president continued to talk about the overall goals of socializing the dogs over the semester, praised a select few who have done outstanding jobs thus far. Then they have the dogs socializing among themselves. The dogs walk in circles around each other sniffing each other out. Then seem to all approve of one another as they each slowly begin to play together as the trainers give them a variety of different balls and ropes to play with. While the trainers watched their dogs to make sure they behaved they also used this time to talk amongst themselves about the different struggles and achievements their dogs have had over the past two weeks. One of the girls talked about how her puppy just does not like walking on a leash, she talks about how her dog just stops in the middle of the hallway and she is forced to drag him along to her next class. While another girl talks about how her dog likes to eat his leash as they walk through campus and she cannot ever get him to stop.

The final part of the meeting is a short exercise where the trainers work with the dogs all together to have all the puppies sit, lay down, and walk on their trainers commands in order to get an treat. They had everyone spread out around the room, as the president walked around and helped those whose dogs were not listening. The people who did not have a dog stood off to the side watching the others trainers while talking to each other about how they could not wait to get their own dogs. Those same dogs that used the beginning of meeting as naptime seemed to excel in the exercise. When their trainer said sit, they sat down, looking straight at their trainers waiting for the treat. When they were told to lie down they relaxed a little laid on the floor and looked up for the treat that they knew would follow. As soon as the trainer would pull on their leash the dog would jump up and follow beside their trainer wherever they went. It was the puppies that were oblivious to the world playing with their leashes and rolling around that struggled with the exercise the most. They were not interested in sitting still; they were ready to run around and play. During this exercise there was a constant chatter among the trainers, and the constant, “sit… sit… stay… good girl.”  One golden retriever in the corner of the classroom, who was by far the smallest and looked to be the youngest of the dogs, would not listen. He just sat there staring at everything going on around him. No toy or treat could bride him. “He is gonna be the stubborn one this semester” another trainer joked. It is kind of hard to believe that they will one day be one the most well behaved dogs helping a disabled owner in the near future.

Taken from http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=337186136323087&set=pb.254871674554534.-2207520000.1361549099&type=3&theater

After doing the exercises for a while, the president yelled out that, everyone was doing a great job and to keep up the good work. This was everyone’s cue that the meeting was over. As the meeting wrapped up the majority of the members packed up all their stuff and filed out of the room, a few people stayed behind to talk to the president individually before leaving. I followed the majority of the crowd out, they all said bye and went their separate ways heading home with their dogs. 

Peer Review Reaction

As I slid my computer over to Cameron I told him that it is just at its starting point, and that I knew it needed a lot more work. I did this to let him know that I had not put in countless hours and that he could tell me it was awful if that is what he really thought.

When it came to reviewing his paper it was slightly more difficult since he had not started his paper. So we talked about his plans. He told me he was focusing on a fraternity. He went to the meeting on Monday and was going to get pictures this week as well. We talked about how he planned on structuring his paper, like maybe what goes on before during and after the meeting to give the reader a sense of how meeting night goes each week.

I do not think that this was really all that effected just because in our situation, I was not able to really give feed back since he had not written his paper. While he did give me some feed back it was not all that helpful, just very vague. I think that in the future I think that it would work better for me if I get feedback from more than one person, and it would be helpful if everyone actually had a rough draft to review.

Peer Review

Peer review frequently has negative feedback but I believe that it can either go very well or be a complete disaster. I believe that peer review should enhance each others papers but does no always achieve that goal for a variety of reasons. In my experiences the biggest problem was the reader either did not want to be mean and really critique the paper or they just did not care, and did not put much effort into reading the paper. I believe that peer review is only helpful when the reviewer actually critiques the paper and gives the writer constructive criticism throughout the entire paper. When it comes to working in groups I prefer working with 3 to 4 people. I also like when the professor chooses the groups because normally the professor matches people based on their strengths and weaknesses. Peer review can really be great or awful and I just hope that for these upcoming projects that it all goes well.

Mini Scene Depiction- Hey Ho by The Lumineers

After looking at different scenes in class I understood the project a little more. I saw that minor details can be either very important or irrelevant. When looking for a scene to depict I wanted to look at a music video because I think scenes are very carefully put together to give the song a certain story. I decided to look at the video for the song Ho Hey by The Lumineers. I decided to use the very first scene, which is the first 35 seconds. This scene is the beginning of the song. It begins with a portrait of the band members hung crooked on the wall along with a series of other pictures and a string of outdoor lights that continue down the entire hallway. The hallway has a very dark dirty feel, especially when you look into a single room full of clutter. The string of lights dim and brighten with the beats of the music and seem to give the hallway just a little bit of warmth. At the end of the hall away one member of the band appears playing his guitar beginning the song, as he walks down the hallway the lights strung along the wall continue with the rhythm of the song that he begins to sing.

Project 2

When I walk around campus and see students training service dogs, I always think that would be such a cool thing to be involved with. So for this project I want to look at one of the two organizations on UK's campus, Wildcat Service Dogs or 4 Paws for Ability. Both of these organizations make a major impact on the Lexington community and would be a great organization to one day possibly be involved in. I have contacted members from both organizations to see which meetings I would be able to attend. I have not heard back from either of them yet, but I hope that I can either attend a meeting or at least interview someone who is currently training a dog buy the end of the week. I hope that one of these two organizations replies to me in the next couple days so I can get this project underway.

Speech Analysis

Starting this project I had no idea what I was going to use as a common thread and in the beginning I struggled. Once I finally found a thread I felt that I had a better grasp on the entire project but after watching myself I see that I could have done a much better job. I think content wise I could have made my thread a little more prominent through repetition and better stories. After I heard everyone else's speeches, I thought of so many more interesting stories I could have told to engage with the audience more. My presentation could have used some work as well, after watching myself (which was just weird) I realized that I talk very fast and said um way too much. It is something that I knew I did, and I tried to work on. I think I did better than I have in the past but I still need to work on it. I also did not realize how often I looked at my slides when I did not need to. I need to work on eye contact with the audience. Something that I had no idea was doing was moving my arms around a lot in such an unorganized fashion. I think it made me look more nervous than anything. Next time I want to work on walking around some and not so many arm movements. Overall I think I did a pretty good job on my speech and being able to watch myself let me know what I need to work on for the next speech.

Outline

Ethos:

It is important to me that I don’t talk to fast or say um after every sentence. In my past speeches I get nervous and try to get them over with as fast as possible. I need to work on slowing down and keeping eye contact with the audience.

Pathos:

 I want my audience to find a way to relate to my stories, by telling my stories in a way for people to put themselves in similar situations in their own lives. I can do this through the eye contact and the stories I choose.

Logos:

Introduction: Looking at three major aspects of life: career, family and entertainment, I can see that one common thread is helping those in need. I have found that after all the help I have received over the years, I am now returning that favor in many different ways.

Body Parts:

Career: kinesiology major—physical therapy

            -People Person- enjoy helping others

            - (story) running which led to injuries, which meant lots of PT

Family: big to small family

            -(story) nobody would never know that my family dynamic just changed drastically with my mom leaving my step dad.

            -helping my mom and brother

            -role model for my brother

Entertainment: DZ

-(story) tymber making me feel comfortable on pref day, I knew that the girls of DZ would one day be my best friends

-being together, feeling as a family doing anything together, brings a sense of ease into what can be a hectic life.

Conclusion: I have found that over the years after getting help for my injuries, how my mom provided for me and then how Delta Zeta created a second family at school, it has created natural want to help others within myself.

An Ellen Degeneres monologue

When I think of someone who is success at giving a great speech or monologue, the first person that came to my mind was Ellen Degeneres. She has had her own show for over 10 years, where each show starts out with a short monologue about anything and everything. And I'm not joking, think of anything and I'm sure she has commented on it in her daily monologue.

I chose a monologue that she did on Christmas trees. She structures this is a way to pull in her audience with her humor. On this particular monologue she picks a very relatable topic of picking out Christmas trees. She engages her audience by including their reactions and comments throughout the speech. She uses ethos, pathos, and logos all throughout this monologue.

Ethos- She finds one of the most relatable topics during the holidays, almost everyone goes out on the hunt to find the perfect Christmas tree. She also brings in some of her personal life by telling her own stories about finding the right tree. She also makes the entire process humorous as well, making fun of the way people pick that right tree

Pathos- She uses this holiday tradition to make an emotional connection with her audience. People are able to think about their own experiences in finding a christmas tree, decorating the tree, and taking the tree down and then relate to all of her jokes throughout her monologue.

Logos- Her organization throughout the monologue is to tie the entire process of having a tree into the speech. She talks about step one of finding the tree, then decorating the tree, and finally having to take the tree down.

Another important aspect of her speech is that she definitely does not seem nervous, she appears to be having fun, by laughing and joking throughout the monologue. She is not just standing up there and reading off cue cards or anything, which means there are not any awkward pauses and she is able to look at both the camera and her live audience. I think Ellen knows exactly how to make a speech about anything both funny and interesting.

Rise of the NBA Nerd

When you think of a sports press conference the attire that would normally be acceptable, would be the just cleaned up after an intense game in the locker room kind of look. When we get more specific and think about the image of an NBA star, most people would see an extremely tall, muscular man, in a jersey and baggy shorts. People normally do not expect these athletes to look put together. Morris takes a look at the relatively recent change in the wardrobe of NBA stars at press conferences. I think that pointing out just what these famous black men are wearing at press conferences is not enough; we need to point out how the fashion of black Americans today has been slowly evolving.

http://fashionscute.com/men-fashion-tips-for-your-best-appearance/black-men-fashion-tips/

It is not just at the NBA press conferences that black celebrities have made noticeably more effort on their personal appearance but in their everyday life these famous men are going to new lengths to dress in a different style. As Morris pointed out, this wardrobe change has made “nerdy” or “white” attire acceptable and cool. Morris compared these styles to Carlton from the TV show The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, at the time of the show Carlton was the farthest thing from cool, but when we look at Kanye West in his gray suit with a tan backpack and thick rimmed glasses, we cannot help to think that he is sporting the nerdy look.

http://qcistyle.com/the-n-crowd/men’s-fashion-geek-chic…/

I believe another important point that Morris is sort of making is that because these celebrities are changing their looks, that means the fans of these of men are going to also change their look. I have definitely noticed this change in the black culture. Ten years ago Abercrombie & Fitch, Hollister, Journeys and Express were all white people stores but now those stores seem to appeal to all races. It is not about looking your color, it is about looking fashionable and put together. I think Morris’ article to commenting on the society change in America, showing that black men are not condemned to the city projects but they too can be smart and successful.